Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 7 results ...

Athapaththu, K I and Karunasena, G (2018) Framework for sustainable construction practices in Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(01), 51–63.

Hassanain, M A, Adewale, B, Al-Hammad, A and Sanni-Anibire, M O (2018) Factors affecting building services’ coordination during the design development and review stages. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(01), 64–77.

Issa, R R, Olbina, S and Zuppa, D (2018) Model for developing trust on US construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(01), 5–23.

Kapogiannis, G and Sherratt, F (2018) Impact of integrated collaborative technologies to form a collaborative culture in construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(01), 24–38.

Odediran, S J and Windapo, A O (2018) Risk-based entry decision into African construction markets: a proposed integrated model. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(01), 91–111.

Parida, S and Brown, K (2018) Investigating systematic review for multi-disciplinary research in the built environment. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(01), 78–90.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Systematic review; Evidence-based practice; Green building; Academic-practitioner divide; Green offices; Multi-disciplinary research;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2016-0056
  • Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which a systematic review approach is transferable from medicine to multi-disciplinary studies in the built environment research. Design/methodology/approach Primarily a review paper, it focuses on specific steps in the systematic review to clarify and elaborate the elements for adapting an evidence base in the built environment studies particular to the impact of green building on employees’ health, well-being and productivity. Findings While research represents a potentially powerful means of reducing the gap between research and practice by applying tried and tested methods, the methodological rigour is debatable when a traditional systematic review approach is applied in the built environment studies involving multi-disciplinary research. Research limitations/implications The foundational contribution of this paper lies in providing methodological guidance and an alternative framework to advance the longstanding efforts in the built environment to bridge the practitioner and academic divide. Originality/value A systematic review approach in the built environment is rare. The method is unique in multi-disciplinary studies especially in green building studies. This paper adopts the systematic review protocols in this cross-disciplinary study involving health, management and built environment expertise.

Tokede, O, Udawatta, N and Luther, M (2018) Retrofitting heritage office buildings in the UK: a case study. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(01), 39–50.